Külföldi torrent oldalak Empornium.me | EMP News

Uploading Rules clarified
We have updated the rules to better clarify what we are after in the way of Descriptions and Screens. The rules have not changed but we have made it clearer what exactly they mean.

Screens

All presentations must have pics/screenshots that describe the content.

1. Use a mosaic (We suggest 3x9 or 2x10 and 800-1200pix wide so the pictures are of a decent size) - not difficult as we have tutorials on those.

2. If you cannot make screens add enough jpegs to show the content
We Suggest one per minute for 5-10 minute clips and one every 5 minutes for something longer

3. Megapacks - Screens are to be in the torreent and a good sample in the presentation - if you upload a pack
you should know how to do the screens!

4. If possible we suggest you use click-able thumbnail images for presentations with a large number of screens.

5. Only a cover or one or two jpegs is not acceptable.

Descriptions

The short version:

ALL uploads must contain a proper English description of the content in the scene(s). This means actually describing the scene!

the long version:

You need to describe the content of the video/movie/clip/whatever. There seems to be a lot of confusion about what is and what is not a description.

First off what is the point of a description? There are several points. First image hosts go down! Image hosts delete images after a period of time. We want the overall presentation of the torrent to stand the test of time. The only way to insure that is by having a text description of the content. Secondly, we want anyone who views the presentation to be able to figure out the content of the video without prior knowledge.

You can find a list of sites for descriptions HERE

What is not a description:

1) Hyperbole -- I got this from Cheggit, I found this on kazza, I found this on an old Hard Drive, etc etc etc while that is interesting it is not a description. Saying that this was released on a specific date is interesting and it marks it as a new fresh (or not so fresh) upload which is great . . . but that does not describe the content. Saying things like "the action is obvious from the title" or "the screens say it all" is not a text description of the content.

2) Reviews/personal opinion -- We know the uploader likes the content they would not have uploaded it otherwise. Stating that the video won this award or that award is interesting but it does nothing to describe the content.

3) Technical information -- the resolution and running time and size and codec and frame rate are important information but they alone do not a description of the content make.

4) Model/actress/Website/producer information -- the name of the models again is interesting but does not a description make. For example telling me that Bobbi Starr is in the movie tells us nothing about the content. She has done many movies in just about every genre -- we need details. Just because the uploader knows that Fu Bar from who-gives-a-crap-istan only does a certain type of movie does not mean that everyone who looks at the torrent page knows that. Again useful information but it is not a substitute for a description. Just because the uploader knows that everything from producer X or website Y has more or less the same plot does not mean that every person on the site knows that!

5) Tag lines from the DVD cover -- things like "Anal Overdrive: Hey mister, give me a ride!" do not adequately describe the content of the video.

All of that can be part of good description but none of them make up a description on their own or together.

Some examples of bad/unacceptable descriptions:

Quoted » Title - Hot Webcam Latina Tags - latina fake boobs webcam big butt Desc - Hot Webcam Latina

Or

Quoted » My collection of anal vids collected over 8 years of collecting. Enjoy, theres some hot stuff in there.

Or

Quoted » My collection of anal vids, this is part one I will be uploading my entire collection in several parts over the coming weeks. So keep an eye out

Yes these are all real world examples taken off the site in the last few days!

When we say we need a better description we want to see something like:

Quoted » Classic pizza guy scene. Pizza guys come to deliver a bunch of pies but the hot blonde can not pay for them . . . whatever will she do? Of course she lets the pizza guy fuck the shit out of her.

That is an example of a descent but minimal description.

A better description would be:

Quoted » Classic pizza guy scene. Pizza guy comes to deliver a pie but the hot blonde can not pay for it . . . whatever will she do? She notices that the pizza guy looks well hung and she lustily glares at his crotch. After a little chat she starts rubbing his cock through his pants. This is followed up by her giving him a blow job for a while. During the blow job both of them get undressed. After a bit he decides to return the favor and he starts eating her out. Missionary sex follows. He convinces her to go doggy as he fucks her from behind. "Well this is nice but if you want 5 free pies you are going to have to do a little bit more" he tells her. She says "Whatever could you mean?". He responds by sliding his dick up to her asshole. After a bit of half hearted arguing she complies. Eventually they switch to reverse cowgirl as she bounces her ass up and down on his member. The scene finishes up with him shooting his load all over her face and he leaves without the pizzas with only the memory of a great sexual encounter as payment.

The best description would add on the name of all of the models and all of the technical information to the second description.

We know that many uploaders do not watch the videos before they post them. We also know that many uploaders speak a language other than English as their primary language. We even know that some of you are just not that comfortable writing descriptions. For those of you like that . . . it is often very easy to find out who the producer/publisher/website of the video/clip/scene/movie is. Go to that producers/publishers/whatever website and simply copy the description provided by them.

Megapack Descriptions

Packs can be much more difficult. First off if you are making a pack of many videos they should be related in such a way that you can describe the content of the pack in a few sentences.

For example:

Ghetto Gaggers partial site rip wrote » Here is a bunch of content I have collected from GhettoGaggers.com. They all contain deep throat gagging of black women. Some contain puking. Most include anal and vaginal sex. Some have DP. I think there is even pissing in one or two.

Strapon Cum partial site rip wrote » Hot, juicy young girls in sexy, kinky outfits play and fuck each other with big strapon that... Squirts loads of hot gooey cum!

StraponDreamer partial site rip wrote » For those of you who are not familiar with the site the content is pretty straight forward. There is a usually very attractive female fucking a guy with a strapon. What differentiates this site from others is that the female usually appears to be genuinely enjoying the whole scene. Also the females are generally much more attractive than on most sites. There is little to none of that typical strapon scene stuff where the the female is berating the male calling them worthless or whatever. There is even one girl girl scene. Most of the videos have little to no dialogue . . . but those that do have dialogue are in English.

Those are all perfectly acceptable descriptions of the content of a few site rips.

A better description would include the names of some/most of the models and all pertinent technical information.

For a site rip that technical information can vary quite a bit. To cover that saying something like the following is perfectly adequate:

Most of these videos are 720p. The earliest videos were only 480p and the latest videos are 1080p. Most are in AVI with a few mp4's.

The best descriptions would include all of the above but every video/scene/whatever would be described in detail as well.

Where packs get difficult is when the pack is for a specific model or a specific category. Say you made a pack of Bobbi Star's anal scenes . . . that would be easy to describe briefly:

Quoted » Check out these 10 scenes where Bobbi Star takes it up the poop shoot long and hard!

That is an example of a descent but minimal description.

However, a Bobbi Star pack that has for example all of her kink.com shoots from 2009 (or whatever) would be very very difficult to sum up in a few sentences. Just do your best to describe why you choose to make a pack like that and you should be ok (as long as those reasons describe the content). An acceptable description would be something like:

I just love Bobbi Star's unbridled enthusiasm for bondage and sex. In her kink.com's scenes from 2009 you can really see how varied her desires are in scenes from several of the kink.com sites like: Everything Butt (anal play), Device Bondage (bondage in hard metal devices), Ultimate Surrender (wrestling), Whipped Ass (spanking), and Fucking Machines (girls getting pleasured by various machines).

An unnaceptable description would be:

Bobbi Star is just just so fucking hot check her out in these scenes from kink.com shot in 2009.

Again the best description would describe each scene in detail and have accurate model and technical information.

Thanks
Clownius and the Emp Team